Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
The article presents an analysis of the concepts of the ideal city as proposed by Frank Lloyd Wright, Paolo Soleri, and Sergey Valentinovich Nepomnyashchy. These thinkers are representative of an intellectual tradition rooted in the notion of "organic architecture," which aims to harmonize the relationship between urban environments, humanity, and nature. The objective of this study is to identify and systematize the key social ideas of each author and to illustrate their relevance in light of contemporary global challenges, such as environmental crises and social inequality. Through a comparative analysis of the social dimensions of these concepts, this research addresses a gap in domestic literature concerning the specific viewpoints of these architects. The findings indicate that, while all three authors focus on minimizing the divide between nature and urban areas, their urban planning approaches differ considerably. For instance, Frank Lloyd Wright’s "Acrotown" embodies a decentralized model, whereas Paolo Soleri’s "Arkosanti" and Sergey Nepomnyashchy’s "Heliocluster" advocate for high-density structures. The comparative analysis further reveals an evolution in the social ideals and values embedded within these architectural theories, transitioning from utopian visions to pragmatic solutions. The originality of this work lies in its thorough comparative analysis and contextualization of S. V. Nepomnyashchy’s contributions within the broader framework of organic architecture. The practical implications of this research highlight the necessity of reviving certain principles established by the founders of organic architecture to devise sustainable urban models that effectively address the pressing needs of contemporary society. This work aims to provide guidance for enhancing current urban practices amid ongoing global challenges.
Ideal city, organic architecture, arcology, Broadacre City, Arcosanti, heliotecture
1. Grigoreva E. A. An apology for utopia: on the return of utopian constructions to the mainstream sociological theorizing. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2024. No. 4. P. 139–147. http://doi.org/10.31857/S0132162524040129. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GJTYJU
2. Grigoreva E. A. Spatial justice from a sociological perspective. Sociology. 2020. No. 5. P. 138–144. http://doi.org/10.31249/espr/2023.03.01. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CEEEZU
3. Dridze T. M. Eco-anthropocentric Model of Social Cognition as a Way to Overcome the Paradigm Crisis in Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2000. No. 2. P. 20–28. (In Russ.)
4. Nepomnyashchii S. V. Heliotecture – crystallization of the future. Architecture and Construction of Russia. 2019. No. 2. P. 30–37. (In Russ.) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SZGFDA
5. Nepomnyashchii S. V. Heliotecture = arcology + pyramid of comfort parameters. In: Science, Education and Experimental Design in MARCHI: Abstracts of the International Scientific and Practical Conference of the Teaching Staff, Young Scientists and Students. 2020. Vol. 2. Moscow: MARKHI. P. 434–436. (In Russ.) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JUGNAY
6. Nepomnyashchy S. V. Heliotecture: The Resonance of Oppositely Polarized Trends. A Turn from the Asphyxia of Total Suburbanization toward the Green Home-City. Intelros. Available at: http://www.intelros.ru/subject/ross_rasput/10809-geliotektura-rezonans-raznopolyarnyx-trendov-povorot-ot-asfiksiitotalnoj-suburbanizacii-k-zelenomu-domu-gorodu.html (accessed 28.02.2024). (In Russ.)
7. Nepomnyashchii S. V. I propose the city of magic doors. EURASIAN AWARD. Available at: https://eurasian-prize.ru/sergey-nepomnyashy-interviw/ (accessed 28.02.2024). (In Russ.)
8. Wright F. L. The Future of Architecture. Moscow: State Publishing House of Literature on Construction and Architecture, 1960. 248 p. (In Russ.)
9. Wright F. L. Broadacre City. Moscow: Strelka Press, 2018. 180 p. (In Russ.)
10. Balsas C. J. L. Paolo Soleri and America’s Third Utopia: the Sustainable City-Region. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 410–430. http://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2020.1726798. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IQZTDG
11. Felici M. The ages of Arcosanti. L’architettura delle città – The Journal of the Scientific Society Ludovico Quaroni. 2016. Vol. 5. No. 8. P. 73–80.
12. Foucault M. The Foucault Reader. New York, 1984. 400 p.
13. Grierson D. Unfinished Business at the Urban Laboratory – Paolo Soleri, Arcology, and Arcosanti. Open House International. 2016. Vol. 41. No. 4. P. 63–72. http://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-04-2016-B0009.
14. History of Arcosanti. Arcosanti. Available at: https://www.arcosanti.org/history/ (accessed 20.08.2023).
15. Maumi C. Broadacre City: Frank Lloyd Wright’s Vision of an Organic Capitalism. In: Inequalities and the Progressive Era. Ed. by Guillaume Vallet. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. P. 172–190.
16. Soleri P. Arcology: The City in the Image of Man. MIT Press, 1973. 134 p.
17. Soleri P. Arcosanti: An Urban Laboratory? Santa Monica, CA: VTI Press, 1987. 80 p.
18. Stankiewicz E. Frank Lloyd Wright’s Broadacre City as a Manifestation of American Values of Freedom and Democracy. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 26–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/cr.2015.09.2.04
19. Watson J. M. The Suburbanity of Frank Lloyd Wright’s Broadacre City. Journal of Urban History. 2019. Vol. 45. No. 5. P. 1006–1029. http://doi.org/10.1177/0096144218797923.
20. Wright F. L. Broadacre City: A New Community Plan. Architectural Record. 1935. Vol. 77. No. 4. P. 344–349.
21. Zevi B. Verso un’architettura organica. Saggio sullo sviluppo del pensiero architettonico negli ultimi cinquant’anni. Einaudi, 1945. 152 p.
