Kemerovo, Kemerovo, Russian Federation
Kemerovo, Russian Federation
The appeal of sociologists to the problems of trigger topics is a relatively new and insufficiently conceptualized area of fundamental and applied research. The regional alignment of network socio-political communications allows us to capture common and unique formats and ways of organizing and perceiving certain trigger topics by network users. The purpose of the article is to consider of sociological approaches to determining trigger topics of real and network socio-political communications in Siberian regions. The objectives of the study are to describe the social characteristics of trigger topics in online communities, as well as a comparison of virtual and real socio-political communications of Siberian communities in the trigger agenda. The article proposes to analyze trigger agendas, taking into account the actor orientation on the scale of regional socio-political communication. While maintaining the destructive orientation of trigger states, network research allows us to consider the freedom to popularize agendas, create fake formats, and virtual associations of constructive and destructive significance. The trigger agenda does not have strictly obvious results and consequences depending on the subject, taking into account the subjectivity, level of significance and specific communicative practices implemented (potential) as a result of the inclusion of trigger topics.
socio-political communication, trigger topics (agendas), network groups, region, Siberia
1. Brodinskaya E. V., Dombrovskaya A. Yu., Lukushin V. A. Dominant types and strategies of discontent networks management in the subjects of Russia: experience in analyzing social graphs. Srednerusskiy vestnik of Social Sciences. 2022. No 17 (4). P. 15–30. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2071-2367-2022-17-4-15-30
2. In Kyzyl, attacks on migrants occurred after fakes about HIV // Heroes of the Russian land. URL: https://vk.com/wall-16279264_863864 (accessed 15.12.2024). (In Russ.)
3. Grebenyuk A. A., Maksimova A. S., Lemaire L. G. Research of social tension based on big data of social networks. Digital Sociology. 2021. No 4 (4). P. 4–12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2021-4-4-4-12
4. Dijk T. Van Discourse and power: representation of dominance in language and communication / translated from English by E. A. Kozhemyakina, E. V. Pereverzeva, A.M. Amatova. Moscow: Librocom Book House, 2013. 344 p. (In Russ.)
5. Ivanov D. V. On the theory of flow structures. Sociological research. 2012. No. 4. P. 8–16. (In Russ.)
6. Kranzeeva E. A., Golovatsky E. V., Orlova A. V., Nyatina N. V., Burmakina A. L. Reactive social and political interactions in innovation processes of Russian regions. Power and management in the East of Russia. 2021. No. 2 (95). P. 86–102. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/1818-4049-2021-95-2-86-102
7. Lebon G. Psychology of peoples and masses. Moscow: Academic Project, 2011. 238 p. (In Russ.)
8. Maksimenko A. A., Zaitsev A. V., Deineka O. S., Zyablikov A.V., Akhunzyanova F. T. Assessment by the population of the effectiveness of digital communication of heads of regions in the online dialogue "government ‒ society". Regionology. 2024. No. 32 (2). P. 217–241. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.127.032.202402.217-241
9. Monakhova E., Gorodnicheva Yu. M., Morozova A. N., Shestakova A. N., Moiseeva V. V., Klyucharev V. A. Trust in manipulative information: from perception to decision-making. Monitoring public opinion: economic and social changes. 2024. No 3. P. 42–66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2024.3.2544
10. Ognev A. S., Brodovskaya E. V., Davydova M. A. Identification of triggers for strengthening social discontent networks in the subjects of the Russian Federation. Power. 2022. No. 30 (5). P. 98–106. (In Russ.)
11. Parma R. V., Davydova M. A. Triggers of political mobilization of mass protests in the social media of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus in 2020–2021. Power. 2022. No. 30 (3). P. 97–103. (In Russ.)
12. Rosenberg N. V. Social networks as the main type of communicative practices of modern youth: a sociological analysis. Science. Society. State. 2022. No. 10 (4). P. 90–98. (In Russ.)
13. Semenova V. V. INTER-encyclopedia: Grounded theory. Oral history. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. 2021. T. 13. No. 1. P. 106-119. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2021.13.1.5
14. Skalaban I. A., Lobanov Yu.S., Sergeeva Z. N., Volchenko S. Y. "The level of fears is off the scale!": how changes become triggers of urban conflicts. The case of Novosibirsk. Sociology of Power. 2023. No. 35 (1). P. 190–218. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-1-190-218
15. Skalaban I. A., Sergeeva Z. N., Lobanov Yu.S., Volchenko S. Yu. The trigger of the conflict. Trigger: the experience of conceptualization and categorization. Society and Security Insights. 2022. No 5 (3). P. 66–86. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2022)3-05
16. Thaler R., Sunstein K. Architecture of choice. How to improve our decisions about health, well-being and happiness. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, 2017. 240 p. (In Russ.)
17. Timofeeva L. N., Ryabchenko N. A., Malysheva O. P., Gnedash A. A. The digital socio-political agenda: testing a new research model based on the Russian Coronavirus 2020 case. Political Studies. 2022. No 5. P. 23–39. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.05.03
18. Tocqueville A. The Old order and revolution. St. Petersburg: Alethea Publishing House, 2008. 248 p. (In Russ.)
19. Yudalevich N. V. Information garbage as a phenomenon of modern society. Business education in the economy of knowledge. 2016. No. 2 (4). P. 119–122. (In Russ.)
20. Allan G. A critique of using grounded theory as a research method. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. 2003. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 1–10.
21. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif. SAGE, 2006. 208 p.
22. Cooley C. H. Genius, Fame and the Comparison of Races. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1897. No. 9. P. 317–358. URL: https://archive.org/details/jstor-1009668/page/n7/mode/2up (accessed 15.12.2024)
23. Park R. E. The City: Suggestions for the Investigation of Human Behavior in the City Environment. American Journal of Sociology. 1915. No. 20 (5). P. 577–612. URL: https://archive.org/details/jstor-2763406 (accessed 15.12.2024) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/212433
24. Tarrow S. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 271 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813245
25. Woods R. The Neighborhood in Social Reconstruction. American Sociological Society. 1914. No. 19. P. 577–591. URL: https://archive.org/details/jstor-2763126 (accessed 15.12.2024) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/212295
