employee
Vladivostok, Vladivostok, Russian Federation
The digital transformation, the impact of which is observed in various spheres of public life, has actualized the discussion about the future. A common technique used by researchers and publicists when trying to identify the predicted digital future is a metaphor, which acts as a succinct explanatory model that serves to name the image of the technological future. One of the images of the future that has a distinctly negative connotation is the image of a digital concentration camp as a state of total digital control over society. The purpose of the article is to identify the advantages and disadvantages, as well as the political and legal significance of the digital concentration camp metaphor in the context of constructing an image of the technological future. The paper substantiates that at the moment the metaphor is characterized by conspiracy theory (a digital concentration camp is being built consciously and purposefully) and theoretical indistinguishability (a digital concentration camp is indistinguishable from a society in which digital technologies are used). At the same time, with proper conceptual refinement, it has significant heuristic and political-legal potential as an evaluation category that allows us to comprehend the process of digital transformation from the perspective of the risks of establishing total digital control. The conclusions obtained contribute theoretically to the problem of understanding the image of the technological future and may also have practical significance in the context of the state’s legal policy in the field of digital transformation.
digital transformation, competition of images of the future, digital control, digital concentration camp, constructing an image of the future, political metaphors
1. Artamonova Yu. D., Volodenkov S. V. Information capsules as a structural component of modern political Internet communication. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science. 2020. No. 53. P. 188–196. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/53/20 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DILHMG
2. Berardi F. The soul at work. From alienation to autonomy. Moscow: Grundrisse, 2019. 320 p. (In Russ.)
3. Braidotti R. Posthuman. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2021. 408 p. (In Russ.)
4. Brockman J. What we think about machines that think: The world’s leading scientists on artificial intelligence. Moscow: Alpina-Non-ficshin, 2017. 552 p. (In Russ.)
5. Volodenkov S. V., Zotov V. V., Conson G. R., Gurov O. N. Prospects for the formation of a prosocial image of the digital future in Russia (expert assessment). NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Right. 2024. No. 1. P. 39–51. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52575/2712-746X-2024-49-1-39-51 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OJPREU
6. Grinbaum A. The scammer machine. How to rid artificial intelligence of evil. St. Petersburg: Translit, 2017. 74 p. (In Russ.)
7. Dessauer F. A dispute about technology. Samara: Publishing House of the Samara Humanitarian Academy, 2017. 266 p. (In Russ.)
8. Dzhibilova E. G., Sultanova G. D., Fidrya E. S. The concept of “digital paradise” and “digital hell” in modern scientific literature from the perspective of futurology. Theory and practice of social development. 2023. No. 2. P. 54–59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2023.2.6 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KIFSFA
9. Dean D. Communism or neo-feudalism. Logos. 2019. No. 6. P. 85–116. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2019-6-85-114; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NIIVHE
10. Zheltikova I. V. The image of the future as an image. Scientific notes of the Orel State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2013. No. 5. P. 75–80. (In Russ.) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RXXJYN
11. Zhukotskaya A. V. Digitalization and some risks of a transparent society. In: Digital humanities: a man in a “transparent” society. Moscow: Knigodel, 2021. P. 5–13. (In Russ.) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CXOPTI
12. Katasonov V. Y. Postcapitalism. From liberal democracy to the digital concentration camp. Moscow: Knizhny Mir. 384 p. (In Russ.)
13. Kane J. A high-security state. Inside the Chinese digital dystopia. Moscow: Individuum, 2023. 336 p. (In Russ.)
14. Kochetkov A. P., Mamychev A. Yu. The state policy of Russia in the digital age: main trends, scenarios and regulatory practices. Polis. Political research. 2023. No. 1. P. 96–113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.01.08 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZNQLRB
15. Lakoff D., Johnson M. Metaphors that we live by. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2004. 256 p. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QRAADX
16. Mamychev A. Yu., Kim A. A., Frolova E. E. “The Future” as an attractor of modern political, legal and socio-economic transformations: an overview of the main problems and approaches. Advances in Law Studies. 2020. No. S5. P. 3–17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29039/2409-5087-2020-8-5-3-17 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VCQMJN
17. Mamychev A. Y. “Digital Leviathan”: scenarios for the development of the Hobbesian monster in the 21st century. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Political Science. 2022. No. 3. P. 367–392. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-3-367-392 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TDPDUS
18. Perzanovski A., Schultz D. The end of ownership: personal property in the digital economy. Moscow: Publishing House “Delo” RANHiGS, 2019. 271 p. (In Russ.) EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JLBELM
19. Prilutsky A. M. The electronic concentration camp of the Antichrist: semiotics of the mythologeme. Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A. S. Pushkin. 2021. No. 3. P. 216–227. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.35231/18186653_2021_3_216; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EMKPTX
20. Standing G. The Precariat: a new dangerous class. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2020. 328 p. (In Russ.)
21. Urry J. What does the future look like? Moscow: Publishing House “Delo” RANHiGS, 2019. 320 p. (In Russ.)
22. Fasman J. The Control Society. How to preserve privacy in the era of total surveillance. Moscow: Eksmo, 2023. 368 p. (In Russ.)
23. Khamel G., Prahalad K. K. Competing for the future. Creation of tomorrow’s markets. Moscow: Olymp-Business CJSC, 2002. 288 p. (In Russ.)
24. Chetverikova O. Digital totalitarianism. How it’s done in Russia. Moscow: Knizhny Mir, 2019. 320 p. (In Russ.)
25. Shaio A. Self-restraint of power (a short course in constitutionalism). Moscow: Jurist, 2001. 292 p. (In Russ.)
26. Shamayu G. Theory of the drone. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2020. 280 p. (In Russ.)
27. Schmitt K. The concept of the political. Questions of Sociology. 1992. No. 1. P. 37–67. (In Russ.)
28. Shoshanna Z. The era of supervisory capitalism. The battle for the human future at the new frontiers of power. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2024. 784 p. (In Russ.)
